This is interesting and I'm
glad this young woman put this conversation out there. It's way past
due. I think a lot of what she says is so true and my daughter
gets rightfully upset when women fawn all over her five year old
son. She redirects the fawning into how much he loves to
play, be a child and work hard in school. She makes it
very clear that he is a child. I had to get on my husband's
attendant (David's been a quadriplegic for more than forty years) a few
weeks ago about that same thing. She was flirting with my grandson like he
was a man. I politely, but very firmly, read her beads.
Even as a young child, I
did not like children singing about love/sex. It made me very, very
uncomfortable and I did not have a vocabulary for expressing that
discomfort. But my parents also were distressed when they saw the
behavior and let us know that they thought it was too much. From the
clothing they wear, music they hear to interactions with adults, children
are "sexualized" far too early and we set them up with all kinds
of mixed messages that then become inappropriate behavior.
We were at a brunch the
other day and my grandchildren were there. One of the women welcomed
another by saying, "Hey slut how you been?" The woman being
called slut said she was thrilled she could still slut. I reminded
them both that children were present. Now it's one thing to have
that conversation amongst adults, but not in the presence of
children. And, I personally don't like the word slut. But that's
another issue.
One of the things that I
want to write about later this year is how black mothers treat their
boys/sons like their "men." I feel for the girls/boys, men
and women trying to date them. From seeming inocous terms like calling
their sons, "my little man" to blatant actions like joining him
on dates with his girlfriends it's serious. I think the sons replace
the men that did not stay around.
I'll be glad when the earth
gets back on its axis of affirmation.
Go well,
Daphne Muse Writer, Social Commentator & Poet
2429 East 23rd Street
Oakland, CA 94601-1235
510 436-4716, 510 261-6064 (FAX)\ msmusewriter@aol.com www.daphnemuse.com
Did WE Sexually Abuse Michael Jackson?
Getting Real about Sex Abuse and Black Boys
My earliest vivid memory as
a child was at a Jacksons' concert. I was four years old, wearing a blue
dress with white polka dots, and Michael and his brothers were on a stage
below me singing and dancing. At some point, the stage lights dimmed and
there was a spotlight on Michael as he began to sing a love song solo. The
changes in lighting and the shift in the mood of the music created in me a
deep feeling of intimacy with Michael, and I remember thinking, "Now
that we're alone, this would be a good time to go talk to him." So I
got up from my seat and started down the stairs of the concert hall to see
my friend Michael. At some point half-way down my journey toward Michael,
my mother stopped me and carried me back to our seats. And I remember
feeling confused and upset, thinking to myself, "why won't she let me
go talk to Michael?"
Like many children throughout the world, I experienced Michael Jackson as
my personal friend. This feeling hasn't completely left me as an adult,
evidenced by the way my friends and I discuss the latest sex abuse scandal
surrounding Michael as if we know him, as if he is a personal friend.
From, "I just can't imagine Michael doing something like that,"
to "You know Michael's father abused all of them and that's why he's
abusing these children," we as a culture feel intimately connected to
Michael in a way that leads us to theorize what is really going on in this
sex abuse scandal.
How did millions of people come to feel as if they have an intimate
connection to Michael Jackson? There are the obvious answers: his enormous
talent and charisma, his incredible exposure in the media, us having
"watched him" grow up "before our eyes," and more. But
I would like to suggest that there was another key factor in how so many
of us came to feel so close to Michael. And that factor is sex.
From the time Michael was six years old, the American public interacted
with Michael as a sexual being. We were encouraged, even manipulated, to
enjoy the novelty of a mini-James Brown, a black boy-child who could pine
and swoon and gyrate like the best of them. We've all heard the
biographies of Michael over the years where he expressed deep confusion
over the sexual-romantic content of his own performances as a child,
frequently asking his older brothers to explain to him what was going on.
We've seen the childhood footage of Michael, where screaming mobs of
people desperately "want" him - fainting, swooning, and trying
to touch him - and the expressions of fear and confusion on his face. I
remember once watching an interview of Michael's older brother, Jermaine,
who described a time when Michael asked him to explain one of the love
songs he had to perform that night. And when Michael asked the question,
Jermaine suddenly realized that Michael had never experienced the
sexual-romantic longing that he was being asked to perform.
That we as a culture "got off" on a child singing "like an
adult" indicates that we are all implicated in the inappropriate
adultification of Michael. And the fact that the thing that "got us
off" was his ability to perform romantic sexual desire through song
and dance, "like an adult," implicates all of us in the
inappropriate sexualization of Michael as a black boy child. Was it an
accident that we, as an American public, had a sexualized relationship
with this black boy in our popular imagination? Of course not. Our
inappropriate sexual relationship with Michael was part and parcel of
cultural processes that socialize us into distorted perspectives about
black men's sexuality and their humanity.
Seeing black men as sexual from birth, as exempt from pre-sexual
childhood innocence, makes it easier for the American public to believe
that black men are in fact sexual aggressors when accusations of sex abuse
are launched against them. This hypersexualization of black boy children
reflects a deep history of racism that strategically over-sexualizes black
men so that it will be easy to rally public support to attack any black
man through claims of sex abuse. This was the logic of the lynch mob. This
is how black men continue to be attacked in the press and criminal justice
system. This is what is happening to Michael (Kobe, R. Kelly, and the list
goes on).
Simultaneously, I do not suggest in any way that we should not deal,
openly and publicly, with the reality that some black men (and I would add
black women, white men, white women, etc.) sexually abuse children. As a
former rape educator who spent years working on issues of the sexual abuse
of children within the black community, I refuse to accept that we should
go silent about sex abuse of children by black men, simply because we know
how racism targets black men in this area. Yes, if a black man gets caught
up in the criminal justice system and the press for sex abuse he will
receive unfair treatment. But no, that does not mean that we then ignore
that some black men do sexually abuse children. And for most of us, it is
difficult to hold both of these positions at the same time - to
simultaneously stand up for the rights of the victimized child and the
rights of the victimized adult black man. We tend to believe in innocent
victims and bad oppressors. And we tend to have trouble seeing how one
person, like a black male pedophile, might inhabit both victim and
oppressor roles, simultaneously.
But what is missing from our public conversation about black men and the
sexual abuse of children is that black men were once children and many of
them were sexually abused. And, I would like to suggest that not only are
many black male children merely sexually abused, individually, through
inappropriate physical contact with the sexual parts of the body; but that
black men, as a group, from the youngest of ages, experience collective
inappropriate sexual attention from every segment of society. I see it
every time I am in a grocery store and a black male baby smiles at a
female cashier, and is then teased for "flirting with her." I
see it in a million ways every day and it infuriates me that another black
boy's innocent desire for connection with other human beings is
inappropriately sexualized. And this is how sexual abuse always
functions. Children's very human need for love, attention, and physical
contact gets perverted into sex by a confused adult...an adult who has
never recovered from when the same thing happened to them. And, perhaps,
most painfully, I see the effects of this sexual socialization on adult
black men, who, frequently, have internalized the idea that the only way
to reach for contact with other human beings is sexually. Unfortunately,
for some men, and many children, this confusion can play out even when
they reach for contact with children.
Did WE, the American public, participate in the sexual abuse of Michael
when he was a boy child through inappropriate sexual attention? Did we
abandon him to this cycle of sexualized racism (or racialized sex abuse),
and fail to stand up against the fact that he was receiving sexual
attention that was inappropriate for his age?
And, if we honestly face the roles we each play in the never-ending
sexualization of black boys and men, then how will we handle the latest
Michael Jackson scandal - this familiar scenario where a black man is
being attacked for having (potentially) sexually abused a child, which
means being attacked for having acted out as an adult the sexual abuse he
experienced as a child?
Hopefully, we won't simply jump on the bandwagon. Hopefully, we'll do
something different this time.
Nikki Stewart is a Ph.D. candidate in Women's Studies at the University of
Maryland. Her research focuses on black girls' relationship with visual
media.
"Seeing
black men as sexual from birth, as exempt from pre-sexual childhood
innocence, makes it easier for the American public to believe that black
men are in fact sexual aggressors when accusations of sex abuse are
launched against them."
". .
.it infuriates me that another black boy's innocent desire for connection
with other human beings is inappropriately sexualized. . .this is how
sexual abuse always functions. Children's very human need for love,
attention, and physical contact gets perverted into sex by a confused
adult."
* * * * *
I feel I must
respond to the sister's argument concerning the sexual abuse of Michael
Jackson. While I agree with much of what she says I have to point out that
not all men who sexually abuse children were themselves sexually abused.
Additionally most adults who were childhood victims of sexual abuse do not
go on to sexually abuse children. I have worked with adolescent sex
offenders for 6 years and most of the offenders I have seen in treatment
were in fact "pre-sexualized".
Pre-sexualization
as we saw with Michael, Janet (remember the May West skits), Beyonce,
Britany and many others has a life long impact.
Pre-sexualization
can occur through the viewing of pornography, sexual abuse, exposure to
adult sexual activity,. Often many who sexually abuse children, were not
actually sexually abused themselves or "pre-sexualized" some
were neglected, physically abused, traumatized in countless ways. Their
response, for whatever reason is often sexual, too often violently sexual.
Another theory
is that when one's social growth is stunted, then one sees one's self at
that stunted age for life. So a child traumatized at 10 may in some ways
become emotionally stuck at 10. During his adult life his or her
desired "playmates" will be 10 year olds. This of course often
becomes a sexualized relationship.