Hello.
. . I Must Be Going By Marty
Khan
“Only
a man of undaunted optimism would embark on such a venture.”
~Charles Chaplin as Monsieur Verdoux
“A
pessimist is sometimes just an optimist with more information.”
~Sufi Proverb
This
article was supposed to be the first in an ongoing column, but
instead I'm just contributing a single multi-part piece and then I'm
probably outta here. I don't see how a regular column would really
accomplish anything other than to offer a minor speed bump in Jazz's
full-throttle rush to oblivion. Unless there is a significant change
in the current mindset that is shared by professionals, advocates,
arts foundations, educators and most disturbingly even the musicians
themselves, the destiny of this profoundly important art form is as
dim as our political future.
I
can already hear the various wheezing, harrumphing and whining of
the ensemble cast of pimps, hustlers and cockeyed optimists who are
ready to point to this musician or that one, this facility or that
one, or some market study research that indicates something or other
to dispel this notion and paint a rosy picture. So, if you want to
buy it, you can keep it. But just remember this for when the real
future hits you squarely between the eyes - what you're buying won't
provide you with any nutrition because it is designed for an
entirely different orifice. And neither remaining upright, watching
your back or clenching your cheeks will prevent it. All I can offer
you is some information derived from a combination of deductive
reasoning and in-the-trenches experience that may provide a piece of
wall against which you can back up for a bit of protection. But,
just as knowing who these men and women currently ruling this
country really are and really stand for will not prevent the
emergence of the Fourth Reich, unless appropriate use is made of
that knowledge; you will not be able to avoid your inevitable
unpleasant destiny unless you make good use of the information I'm
trying to give you here.
You
are all the victims of Big Lies, conceived by Big Liars and spread
by small-time hustlers, self-seeking weasels, Kulchur pimps and
self-loathing whores - with a little too much help from some truly
dedicated and optimistic individuals who are simply unable to see
the forest for the trees. Combine this with those most willing
victims - the musicians, who insist upon remaining slaves, shackled
by their comfortable ignorance, short-sightedness and willingness to
plant their silent lips upon the glutes of anybody who can offer
them the luxury of allowing them to work for chump change - and
you've got the ideal formula for destruction.
We
are a culture of Lies and we thrive upon them. Probably the biggest
one of all is that we believe we are seekers of Truth. But we have
no more of a desire to look into the mirror of Truth than we have to
hammer rusty nails into our own eyeballs. As a nation we've accepted
Big Lies without even a whimper - that George Bush was elected in
2000; that George Bush was elected in 2004; that we are killing tens
of thousands of innocent people on behalf of liberty, justice and
self-protection rather than greed, power and racism. We either buy
into it, try to put it out of our minds or maybe toss out a prayer,
an epithet or a tsk-tsk.
The
same ugliness has taken over in the previously sacrosanct world of
Fine Arts and Culture. The hypocrisy, inside dealing, back-stabbing,
self-serving manipulation, arrogance, racism and unfettered greed
that we associate with the despicable realms of ultra-right-wing
politics is in full bloom in the supposedly left-wing world of Arts
and Culture.
The
bottom line here is the bottom line. It all boils down to two things
- money and power. Here we find the common link between the ultra
right-wing industrialists and imperialistic neo-cons, with the
self-deluded ultra-left of Arts, Culture and Education.
Now
that you may be seeking some refuge in labeling my claims as the
raving of a Sixties-bred Marxist/Utopian paranoid, let's look at
some specifics.
Over
the past 15 years, a staggering amount of money has been handed out
- yes, given away - all to supposedly improve the Jazz environment
for musicians, audiences and the American population in general.
(BIG LIE # 1 - we'll look at that and the other Big Lies that lie
behind this a little later).
-
In
two somewhat consecutive 5-year initiatives, the Lila Wallace
Foundation (The 20-city Lila Wallace Jazz Network) and the Doris
Duke Foundation (the 14-city Jazz Net) have laid out nearly 25
million dollars purportedly toward the aforementioned goal. This
money was distributed primarily to a single facility in each
city, with a small regional touring component (Wallace) and a
small commissioning component (Duke) in conjunction.
-
The
10-part PBS film, Ken Burns Jazz, with 14 million dollars
co-funded by the corporate and foundation world, was purportedly
going to bring Jazz into the cultural mainstream. Its various
supporters in the Jazz and fine arts yapster community said that
it would increase album sales and open up new opportunities for
Jazz artists by making the music compelling to a previously
uninformed audience.
-
The
juggernaut institution Lincoln Center, with its Jazz division's
annual budget in the 15 million dollar range, was able to raise
over 150 million dollars for its aggressive building campaign,
resulting in three new, "state-of-the-art" (their
words, not mine) facilities. All of the contributions they've
solicited have been done so under the assumption that Lincoln
Center Jazz is good for the health of Jazz.
-
All
over the U.S., with Lincoln Center as its model, other wannabe
monolith facilities have sprung up, raising funds from
foundations, local municipalities and corporations, and private
contributors.
Add
up all this scratch and we're looking at more than half a billion
dollars! Let's subtract the amounts that could be attributed to
investment and earned income (General Motors and Time Warner's
participation in the Burns film; the LCJO's performance fees, etc.)
and we still have over a quarter of a billion dollars handed over
with no strings attached - all to benefit this Great Indigenous
American Art Form.
Now
let's look at the empirical evidence of exactly where the U.S. Jazz
scene is today:
-
The
opportunities for Jazz artists to perform live is at its worst
state in decades - maybe ever. Multi-city touring is virtually
non-existent for all but a very small and selected few. The
week-long club engagement is virtually extinct. Multi-night
engagements are extremely rare. Highly respected and
well-established artists are performing more often than ever
before for portions of door receipts with no guaranteed fees.
“You
are all the victims of Big Lies, conceived by Big
Liars and spread by small-time hustlers, self-seeking
weasels, Kulchur pimps and self-loathing whores...”
|
-
Jazz
record sales (including downloads, etc.) are at an all-time
low. Any argument to the contrary would have to be based upon
the inclusion of record sales by artists like Norah Jones,
Jamie Cullum and various "smooth Jazz" artists whose
sales should not count any more toward the equation than
artists like Van Morrison, Booker T & the MGs or Boots
Randolph did decades ago.
-
Jazz
radio, already confined to college stations and NPR affiliates
has received extensive cutbacks in time even from those
outlets.
-
Jazz
education has become a huge business, but is really no more
than a coat of whitener (pun intended) on a badly decayed
tooth. Not only has it fallen under the spell of the Jazz
industry through the merger of the International Association
for Jazz Education (IAJE) with the industry self-promotional
tool and personal back-patter, The Jazz Alliance international
(JAI), but also, it is spilling thousands of new musicians
onto a scene where they will find very few opportunities for
self-expression (as to the quality of these young men and
women as artists, I'll leave that to others).
-
Jazz
has become totally marginalized in mainstream American
society. General music magazines have significantly cut back
coverage of Jazz, if not eliminating it entirely. Mainstream
magazines, from People to Playboy don't even
regard Jazz as a genre market as they do such forms as blues,
bluegrass, world, etc. Television coverage is almost
exclusively limited to BET Jazz, whose payment to artists is
that old hustle, Exposure. PBS, the only other outlet (and
rare at that) seems to think that the only living Jazz
musician is Wynton Marsalis. (There is, however, a new one
hour 13-week show being prepared for PBS. It's the first
regular Jazz show for television in some 40 years. We shall
see what effect it may have. My gut tells me one thing, but
I'll wait for more information to get my brain more involved.)
-
And
most distressingly of all, Jazz has become generally
irrelevant to the African American community, especially its
youth. Nice job, y'all!
If
any of the people who were the designers, architects and advisors
on these various initiatives and programs were managers of
big-league baseball teams, they would have been tossed out of the
dugouts and sent out scouting high school players in
Scahooteyville, North Dakota. That is, if their goal was to
actually accomplish what the rhetoric claimed. But it wasn't.
Essentially, the game here was much like the Bush plan for tax
cuts for the rich, to put more money into the hands of the few at
the expense of the many. Now, I am not saying that we have a bunch
of Karl Roves and other starve-the-beast, Machiavellian neo-cons
at work here. I don't think that the various parties involved in
these initiatives said "Hey, let's take whatever money that
Randy Weston, Sam Rivers, Sonny Fortune and Johnny Griffin were
making and let's give it to Wynton."
But
the result was just that. The folks who are responsible or
complicit simply don't give a damn as long as they continue to get
their share or their jobs, and can cover their uselessness with
rhetoric and phony statistics. As for the Big Lie, it's identical
to the "justification" for the tax cuts. "Let's
give these big chunks of money to a small handful in order to
stimulate the economy." Trickle down theories that simply do
not work, have not worked, and will never work. Because most of
those who get money, power, control, esteem, whatever, only share
what they must in order to create a cosmetic appearance, and keep
the rest. The few who actually are sincerely committed and do the
right thing end up being used by the others who don't, as proof of
the concept's success.
Before
I get to an examination of why the Wallace and Duke Initiatives,
the Burns film and Lincoln Center have utterly failed to
accomplish what they claim were their goals, and to substantiate
the empirical evidence of those failures that I've listed, I'd
like to finish this first part of the piece with the two Big Lies
that are at the heart of the matter.
-
That
Jazz was in trouble during the late '70s and early '80s,
before Lincoln Center and the Fine Arts Foundation world
stepped forward to rescue it.
-
That
all of the "idealistic" efforts put forward by
Wallace, Duke, Burns, Lincoln Center, the IAJE, the JAI and
all of the spinners, yappers, pimps and phonies who huckster
them are about helping musicians and bettering the overall
Jazz environment.
The
Truth is that:
-
In
the late '70s and early '80s, Jazz was on the cusp of a
significant increase in audience development for all forms of
the music, especially the more progressive genres; and the
artists were on the brink of true self-empowerment. This was
before the fine arts world stepped into the picture in any
significant way, other than through related and very moderate
government funding at the local, state and Federal levels
-
The
true interests of these funding initiatives and mechanisms
have been corporate gains and real estate. The primary
resources of Jazz greatness - the musicians themselves - have
been left behind. The Truth is that the bigwigs of the Fine
Arts World - the funders, the presenters, and the various
personnel involved with them - either do not understand Jazz,
like it, or respect it; sometimes all three. And the various
Jazz advocates, pundits, experts, moguls, and George Wein
wannabes (Weinees?) have sold out the music for their little
pots of gold, fiefdoms, consulting gigs and/or strutting
privileges.
In
the next installment, I will back up the claims about where Jazz
was headed in the late '70s and early '80s with specific evidence
and I will also delve into the specifics of the various
initiatives and wasteful expenditures of the past 15 years.
Let
me leave you with one item to consider in this regard. Imagine
what could have been accomplished with the 150+ million dollars
that was contributed to Lincoln Center Jazz in order to build
three new concert facilities in a city full of concert facilities.
Imagine what could have been done for the artists in terms of
product distribution and marketing, health and pension plans,
Internet utilization, worthwhile education programs, meaningful
public exposure, etc.
The
bottom line is that contributing that kind of money to Lincoln
Center is like contributing a hundred thousand dollars to the
memorial service of a man who died because he couldn't afford a
ten thousand dollar operation.
For
those of you who are bristling with umbrage at the image you're
seeing in the mirror I'm placing on the table, here, another Sufi
proverb:
"The
useful man performing useful work is not angered if he is called
useless; but the useless, who convince themselves that they are
performing significant work become enraged when the word is
applied to them."
For
the rest of you, until the next time, Peace & A Love
Supreme...
Discuss
Hello.
. . I Must Be Going on the AAJ Bulletin Board.
|