#43 - CONSPIRACY THEORY?

Motto for the New Age:

"God" is Divine MIND - "The Creator" is THOUGHT 

Please View this Important Website:
www.naturalusa.com/ads/treeoflife.html
Kanya Vashon McGhee
1701 M. L. King Drive SW
Atlanta, GA 30314-2227

email: drkanya9@hotmail.com

404-753-5700  Toll Free 1-866-840-5700

July 22, 2007

Dear Joan,

With regards to this article, it was written by John Coleman www.Coleman300.com and passed along by me. I, too, agree that there are some discrepancies in his view but none the less a valuable perspective.

Brother Kanya Vashon McGhee

The Beatles and the Aquarian Conspiracy

By John Coleman (www.Coleman300.com)

An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population group in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent" of the BEATLES. The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a social experiment which would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which they were not even aware.

When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake. The Beatles were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)-2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report pre-pared by SRI Center for the study of Social Policy, Director,
Professor Willis Harmon.

The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to introduce by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against its will.

New words and new phrases--prepared by Tavistock(1)-- were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.

As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have been accomplished without the cooperation of the media, especially the electronic media and, in particular,
the scurrilous Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role he was to play. Nobody would have paid much attention to the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music" that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press exposure.

The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern" flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee of 300.

Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger words created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new targeted group, the youth of America.

The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that
Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting like trained robots "with a little help from their friends"--code words for using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became a highly visible "new type"-- more Tavistock jargon--and as such it was not long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and language usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended. This was part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out by Willis Harmon and his team of social scientists and genetic engineering tinkerers and put into action.

The role of the print and electronic media in our society is crucial to the success of brainwashing large population groups. Gang wars ended in Los Angeles in 1966 as the media withdrew its coverage. The same thing will happen with the current wave of gang wars in Los Angeles. Street gangs will wither on the vine once media saturation coverage is toned down and then completely withdrawn. As in 1966, the issue would become "burned out."
Street gangs will have served their purpose of creating turbulence and insecurity. Exactly the same pattern will be followed in the case of "rock" music. Deprived of media attention, it will eventually take its place in history.

Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles,
had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music." I hate to use these beautiful words in the context of "Beatlemania"; it reminds me of how wrongly the word "lover" is used when referring to the filthy interaction between two homosexuals writhing in pigswill. To call "rock" music, is an insult, likewise the language used in "rock lyrics."

Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to separate and fragment society.

The media now focused its attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from main-stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles before them.

The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions of young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical revolution without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by helplessly, unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting in a maladaptive manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all types, marijuana, and later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided for them by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic ergotamine, a powerful mind-altering drug.
The Committee of 300 financed the project through one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.

The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample" size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time?
There is compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.

With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving in the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calendar of American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of drugs among the youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy beat sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it." Peer pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received maximum coverage from the jackal media, which cost the conspirators not one single thin dime.

Great anger was felt by a number of civic leaders and churchmen over the new cult but their energies were misdirected against the RESULT of what was going on and not against the CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the same mistakes that had been made in the prohibition era, they criticized law enforcement agencies, teachers, parents anybody but the conspirators.

Alan Ginsberg


Because of the anger and resentment I feel toward the great drug plague, I make no apology for using language which is not customary for me to use.
One of the worst drug slobs ever to walk the streets of America was Alan Ginsberg.

This Ginsberg pushed the use of LSD through advertising which cost him nothing, although under normal circumstances it would have cost millions of dollars in TV advertising revenues. This free advertising for drugs, and LSD in particular, reached a new high in the late 1960's, thanks to the ever-willing cooperation of the media. The effect of Ginsberg's mass advertising campaign was devastating; the American public was subjected to one cultural future shock after another in rapid succession.

We became over-exposed and over stimulated and, again, may I remind you that this is Tavistock jargon, lifted from the Tavistock training manual, overwhelmed by its new development and, when we reached that point, our minds began to lapse into apathy; it was just too much to cope with, that is to say, "long range penetration had taken hold of us."

Ginsberg claimed to be a poet but no greater rubbish was ever written by anyone who ever aspired to becoming a poet. Ginsberg's designated task had little to do with poetry; his main function was to push the new subculture and force acceptance of it upon the large targeted population group.

To assist him in his task, Ginsberg cooped the services of
Norman Mailer, a writer of sorts who had spent some time in a mental institution. Mailer was a favorite of the leftwing Hollywood crowd and so had no problem with getting maximum television time for Ginsberg. Naturally Mailer had to have a pretext-- not even he could blatantly come out with the true nature of Ginsberg's television appearances. So a charade was adopted: Mailer would talk "seriously" on camera with Ginsberg about poetry and literature.

This method of getting wide television coverage at no cost to themselves was followed by every rock group and concert promoter who followed the example set by Ginsberg. The electronic media moguls had big hearts when it came to giving free time to these dirty verminous creatures and their even dirtier products and filthy ideas. Their promotion of horrible garbage spoke volumes and, without abundant help from the print and electronic media, the drug trade could not have spread as rapidly as it did in the late 1960's-early 197O's, and probably would have been confined to a few small local areas.

Ginsberg was able to give several nationally televised performances extolling the virtues of LSD and marijuana, under the guise of "new ideas" and "new cultures" developing in the art and music world. Not to be outdone by the electronic media, Ginsberg's admirers wrote glowing articles about "this colorful man" in the art and social columns of all of America's largest newspapers and magazines.

There had never been such an across-the-media-board free advertising campaign in the history of newspaper, radio and television and it cost the promoters of the Aquarian conspiracy, NATO and the Club of Rome not one red cent. It was all absolutely free advertising for LSD, only thinly disguised as "art" and "culture."

One of Ginsberg's closest friends, Kenny Love, published a Five-page report in the New York Times. This is in accordance with the methodology used by Tavistock and Stanford Research: If something is to be promoted which the public has not yet been fully brainwashed to accept, then have someone write an article, covering all sides of the subject matter.

The other method is to have live television talk shows in which a panel of experts promotes the product and or idea under the pretext of "discussing", it. There are point and counter-point, both pro and con participants airing their support or opposition. When it is all over, the subject to be promoted has been dinned into the public mind. While this was new in the early 1970's, today it is standard practice on which talk shows thrive.

Love's Five-page pro LSD pro Ginsberg article was duly printed by the New York Times. Had Ginsberg tried to buy the same amount of space in an advertisement, it would have cost him at least $50,000. But Ginsberg didn't have to worry; thanks to his Friend Kenny Love, Ginsberg got the massive advertising all for free.

With newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post under the control of the Committee of 300, this kind of free advertising is given to any subject matter, and more especially to those promoting decadent life styles--drugs-hedonism-- anything that will confuse the American people. After the trial run with Ginsberg and LSD, it became standard Club of Rome practice to call upon major newspapers in America to give free advertising on demand to people and ideas they were promoting.

Worse yet--or better yet, depending upon the viewpoint-- United Press (UP) picked up Kenny Love's free advertising for Ginsberg and LSD and telexed it to HUNDREDS of newspapers- and magazines around the country under the guise of a "news" story.

Even such highly respectable establishment magazines as "Harpers Bazaar" and "TIME" made Mr. Ginsberg respectable. If a nation-wide campaign of this magnitude were presented to Ginsberg and the promoters of LSD by an advertising agency, the price tag would have run into at least $1 million in terms of 1970 dollars. Today the price tag would be nothing less than $15-$16 million dollars. It is no wonder that I refer to the news media as "jackals."

I suggest that we try to find any media outlet to do an expose on the Federal Reserve Board, which is what I did. I took my article, which was a good expose of the greatest swindle on earth, to every major newspaper, radio and television station, magazine house and several talk-show hosts.

A few made promises that sounded good--they would definitely air the article and have me discuss it--give them about a week and they would get back to me. Not one of them ever did, nor did my article ever appear in the pages of their newspapers and journals. It was as if a blanket of silence had been thrown over me and the subject I was endeavoring to promote, and indeed that was precisely what had happened.

Without massive media hype, and without almost around the clock coverage, the hippie-beatnik rock, drug cult would never have gotten off the ground; it would have remained a localized oddity. The Beatles, with their twanging guitars, silly expressions, drug language and weird clothes, would not have amounted to a hill of beans. Instead, because the Beatles were given saturation coverage by the media, the United States has suffered one cultural shock after another.

The men buried in the think tanks and research institutions, whose names and faces are still not known to but a few people, made sure that the press played its part. Conversely, the media's important role in not exposing the power behind the future cultural shocks made certain that the source of the crisis was never identified.

Thus was our society driven mad through psychological shocks and stress. "Driven mad" is taken from Tavistock's training manual. From its modest beginnings in 1921, Tavistock was ready in 1966 to launch a major irreversible cultural revolution in America, which has not yet ended. The Aquarian Conspiracy is part of it.

Thus softened up, our nation was now deemed ripe for the introduction of drugs which was to rival the prohibition era in scope and the huge amounts of money to be made. This too was an integral part of the Aquarian Conspiracy. The proliferation of drug usage was one of the subjects under study at the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at Tavistock's Sussex University facility. It was known as the "future shocks" center, a title given to so-called future oriented psychology designed to manipulate whole population groups to induce "future shocks." It was the first of several such institutions set up by Tavistock.

"Future shocks" is described as a series of events which come so fast that the human brain cannot absorb the information. As I said earlier, science has shown that there are clearly marked limits to the amount of changes and the nature of them that the mind can deal with. After continuous shocks, the large targeted population group discovers that it does not want to make choices any more.
Apathy takes over, often preceded by mindless violence such as is characteristic of the Los Angeles street gangs, serial killers, rapists and child kidnapers.

Such a group becomes easy to control and will docilely follow orders without rebelling, which is the object of the exercise. "Future shocks," says SPRU, "is defined as physical and psychological distress arising from the excess load on the decision-making mechanism of the human mind." That is Tavistock jargon lifted straight from Tavistock manuals--which they don't know I have.

Just as an overloaded electrical circuit will activate a trip switch, so do humans "trip out," which is a syndrome that medical science is only now beginning to understand, although John Rawlings Reese conducted experiments in this field as far back as the 1920's. As can be appreciated,
such a targeted group is ready to "trip out" and take to drugs as a means of escape from the pressures of so many choices having to be made.

This is how Drug usage was spread so rapidly through America's "beat generation." What started with the Beatles and sample packages of LSD has grown into a flood-tide of drug usage which is swamping America.

The drug trade is controlled by the Committee of 300 from the Top down. The drug trade started with the British East India Company and was closely followed by the Dutch East India Company. Both were controlled by a "Council of 300." The list of names of members and stockholders of the BEIC read like something out of Debretts Peerage. BEIC established the "China Inland Mission," whose job it was to get The Chinese peasants, or coolies, as they were called, addicted to opium. This created the market for opium which the BEIC then filled.

In much the same way the Committee of 300 used "The "Beatles" to popularize "social drugs" with the youth of America and The Hollywood "in-crowd."
Ed Sullivan was sent to England To become acquainted with The first Tavistock Institute "rock group" to hit the shores of the United States. Sullivan then returned to the United States to draft the strategy for the electronic media on how to package and sell the group.

Without the full cooperation of the electronic media and Ed Sullivan, in particular, "The Beatles" and their "music" would have died on the vine. Instead, our national life and the character of the United States was forever changed.

Now that we know, it is all too clear how successful the "Beatles" campaign to proliferate the use of drugs became.
The fact that "The Beatles" had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno was concealed from public view.

The prime function to "The Beatles" was to be discovered by teenagers, who where then subjected to a non-stop barrage of "Beatle music," until they became convinced that they liked the sound and adopted it, along with all that accompanied it. The Liverpool group performed up to expectations, and with "a little help from their friends," i.e., illegal substances we call drugs created a whole new class to young Americans in the precise mold ordained by the Tavistock Institute.

(1) An Institute in UK where they research in mind control, run by highly trained psychiatrists who answer to the Illuminati. From here Ayatollah Khomeini, Radovan Karadzic and Milosevic among others were all trained for their mission.

So far Dr. John Coleman.

It's not mentioned here, but
the Rolling Stones were created from the same source and with the same purpose. Beatles were supposed to be the "good guys" while the Rolling Stones were the "bad guys". Also, Rolling Stones were experts in creating repeating "riffs", meaning a musical phrase that's looping over and over again (like in "Satisfaction", "Jumping Jack Flash" etc.).

These repeating riffs trigger the mind and make one receptive to whatever sub-message you want to transfer into the minds of the listener. In the case of the Rolling Stones we have satanic messages in their lyrics, and they have repeated that over and over through the years (a more recent example is the "Bridge To Babylon" album).

Another interesting thing is that
The Beatles were knighted by Queen Elisabeth in the 60's for their "good work". Ringo told the press he'd been so nervous he had to smoke pot in the bathroom before he met the Queen. Recently Paul McCartney was knighted again. The question is: is it the same Paul McCartney?

AFTER SENDING THIS MESSAGE FROM KANYA VASHON MCGHEE OUT TO MY CYBER FRIENDS, THE RESPONSES BELOW FROM DINIZULU GENE TINNIE ARE EYE-OPENING.

Well, we heard it here first!

It has been said that the mass of people -- meaning most of us -- can't distinguish idiocy from genius, because we just don't know enough.  Who is to say that this ranting is not truth and wisdom, unrecognizable to us because we have been so conditioned to accept only a narrow mode of thinking that we call "rational"?

I can't say that I know who any of these villains are, Tavistock, the Committee of 300, or even the Illuminati, whom I have at least heard of before.  But I also do not doubt for a second that there are individuals and groups on planet earth who ardently wish to have this kind of power to control populations, or that some of them have the resources to try some experiments that might even produce some observable results.  This is probably more true today than anything of the Beatle era, so I wouldn't just dismiss the writer of this piece as being totally delusional.

Nonetheless, truth is truth, and sense is sense, and if a person wants to make a convincing argument, it helps to have the facts right.  To claim that words like "teenager," "rock" (as in music), or even "cool" did not exist before the coming of the Beatles onto the scene is so obviously uninformed that the whole rest of the text becomes questionable at best (to be very kind).

The writer's subjective fixation on images of "filth," "garbage" and the like suggest that there are some mental processes going on here that might benefit from deeper examination.  Such puritanical values, as they have been called, have been the cause of an enormous amount of human suffering.

Of course, what this all amounts to is just one more "Conspiracy Theory" (or maybe hypothesis), but that may even be giving it too much credit.  Yet, an African proverb reminds us, "When the fool speaks, the wise man listens."  Why, we might ask, are these conspiracy theories so much a part of our culture, whether we chose to believe them or not?  Is it not true that, in spite of all of the rhetoric we have learned about "freedom" and "democracy" and "equality," there is a huge disparity in wealth and power between the great masses of us and, say, the richest 5% of the population?  Many who are monetarily rich did not come by their wealth by honorable means, and so are prepared to resort to any means necessary to keep their positions of privilege and power, and if there is a way to "dumb down" or control large segments of the population that might otherwise question or resist their authority, they would certainly not hesitate to apply it.  It is not difficult to imagine some of them actually resorting to a scheme like the one that is described here.

Ironically, the writer of this rant has actually accomplished their mission by believing that they can be all that powerful, and by subscribing to fear.  The fact is that real people in the real world -- as certainly most of us in the African World know -- are just not that easily programmable.  There are too many unpredictable factors, too many individual differences.  As Old Abe Lincoln is said to have said, "You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

The other side of the argument is that the conspirators know this, and only aim to fool enough of the people enough of the time, which they do with great success.  Lest we think that the Children of Africa are too smart for the game, I witnessed some of the frenzy with my own eyes among some of our youth on the morning that a much-hyped unveiling of the latest pair of Nike sneakers was taking place. The writer here might be "tripping" indeed, but, whether his Beatles theory actually stands up to scrutiny in the harsh light of truth or not, he or she is onto something about what our human condition has become in this modern world of media manipulation and marketplace madness for consumer goods.

It all sounds as looney as those rantings about black helicopters and dark forces at work deep inside government circles but, at the same time, as the saying goes, "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."  There is no reason to doubt that there are vile characters seriously at work to make us all their willing slaves, but just as in the days of slavery itself, there was and is an even stronger force within the human spirit that resists such an unnatural order of things the same way our immune systems resist viruses.  So their next move would be to suppress our immune systems (a spiritual form of AIDS), we might suppose, but life is not so easily defeated.

The final irony in this whole piece is that the rebellion and discontent that the writer associates with the Beatles phenomenon was more than anything else a reaction against the kind of programming that puritanical people like this author were trying to impose on the younger generation.  ALL younger generations have to find their own way, make their own mark and prepare themselves to take the place of those who went before.  In some cultures, this process is organized through rites of passage and the like.  Here, where we have "freedom," and madness is allowed to run amok as long as it generates a profit, young folk are on their own, and can be relied upon to find some way of life that will piss off their parents' generation.  What else is new? 

As our Ancestors knew well, the way to deal with sick and corrupt forces in power is to recognize that they are there and that they can be a serious threat to well being, but to go on with the business of life without dwelling fearfully on who all they might be (anybody), what all they might do (literally anything), etc.  What we cannot control (or prove) we leave alone and get on with what we can control and accomplish, knowing that this in the end is far more powerful than the worst of what the worst of people may throw at us.

If rantings like this serve any purpose at all, it is only to remind us to be very strong in who we are, rather than frightened and distracted by mythical exaggerations of the powers of the criminally insane.  With that thought, I thank you for sharing this.

Gene,

You are tooooooooooooooo prolific. Good grief. You make me wish I was a student in one of your classes. But I think I would have to be writing as profoundly as you do and that scares me. Ha ha ha ha ha

This brother is her in Atlanta, but he owned the bookstore TREE OF LIFE in Harlem for years. He does seem to be ranting, but I believe he as insight into the workings of the "dark forces" here in America and abroad. He's an elderly man and has seen a lot of stuff. I believe, wholeheartedly, what you say, though about fooling the people some of the time and about living past the fear.

Thanks, you have opened my eyes, again, as usual

Love

Joan

Joan,

Well, chalk up the prolific thing to your powers of inspiration!

As you can see, I am learning to think with a bit more patience, to weigh all sides, to try to learn something about life from everybody who is living.  I often remind myself that we came through one hell of a shipwreck.  Some of us got hit upside the head and may not be thinking or doing right, but they still know something. Some of those same knocked heads might have been jolted into unprecedented powers of eloquence but don't know a damn thing.  All of us are on our own with nothing much but each other to turn to for healing and understanding, even though many of us have no such preparations for such roles, and a whole lot of us are still hurting too bad or wondering what happened or are too busy still cursing or praying to be of much service to anyone else.  It is life.  It is us.  We are still here, in spite of it all. 

What it makes us do is to find ways to dig deeper, tap into the soul of memory and Ancestors' wisdom, to the place of truth that remains still, beyond all convulsions of history or differences we might imagine among ourselves.  (Surely that's what you do in your best moments as a vocalist).  It is that truth, and our role as truth knowers, truth keepers and truth tellers, thrust upon us by history, that has sustained us and provided us with something that the rest of the world (but not necessarily those in our own homeland) knows has value.  (Why you could make a better living in Switzerland than in Georgia). 

The brothers' allegations about the Beatles conspiracy are way beyond my powers to prove or disprove, agree with or disagree with, but I recognize his as another brother's voice out of the shipwreck.  Somewhere in that narrative he is speaking with us, for us, as one of us, about a human truth that transcends all debates regarding "facts" and runs deeper than even our emotions.  It may be about the voice, not the words, or even the Spirit and not the voice.  For sure, whatever it may be taken as in the way of human communication, it is just one more confirmation that we are all manifestations of God.  A simple and obvious thought, it would seem, but history and experience have proven to us many times over that "Common sense ain't common."  It takes experiences, special moments, artistic penetrations of the soul, to remind us of this and attune our living to that wisdom. This brother's writing, or ranting as I have dared to call it, given all of its due respect, is one of those moments, whatever else I might have thought of it, and that's what accounts for the prolific response from me.  I am sure it will touch other souls in other ways, but, if we remain focused, it might all bring us to that same place of truth.

So now you even got more "prolificity" out of me! 

All the best to you, all ways,

G

Motto for the New Age:

"God" is Divine MIND - "The Creator" is THOUGHT 

Please View this Important Website:
www.naturalusa.com/ads/treeoflife.html
Kanya Vashon McGhee
1701 M. L. King Drive SW
Atlanta, GA 30314-2227

email: drkanya9@hotmail.com

404-753-5700  Toll Free 1-866-840-5700